our factory to Qilihe a customer grain producing areas of mechanical harvesting and artificial harvest are as follows:
comparison1 mechanical harvest compared with the manual harvesting, artificial to after harvest, packing, handling, threshing, Chhnang etc. work process, loss rate was 7%, while the mechanical harvesting of disposable can complete the multi-channel processes, directly to the food packed in bag, loss rate was 2.5%, 4.5% less than the manual harvesting loss. The average per mu yield of 564.6kg per mu, reduce the loss of 25.4kg. According to the extended area of 155000 MU calculation, can reduce the loss of 3937000 kg, in 2014 Jiangsu area rice price 2.1 yuan /kg calculation, mechanical harvesting than artificial harvesting to reduce the loss of 8270000 yuan.
2 mechanical drying compared with artificial drying, reduce the loss of 3.2% (mechanical drying loss rate was 1.8%, artificial drying is 5%). The average per mu yield of 564.6kg, reduce the loss of 339.2t per mu, 2.1 yuan to the calculation of /kg, mechanical drying than artificial drying several income 712300 yuan.
more than two items to reduce the loss of 8982300 yuan, if considering the value coefficient of 0.7, guaranteed recovery coefficient is 0.8, reduce the loss of 8982300 yuan *0.7*0.8=503 yuan, and has good economic benefit.
玉米烘干塔 水稻烘干机
